QUOTE(Lord Zeved @ Jan 6 2003, 02:50 PM)
I understand that NO religion is supposed to be taught in school due to the first ammendment...
No religious
instruction is to be taught in public schools - and no religion is to be
promoted. I see nothing wrong with the study of religion - and, indeed, believe it should be encouraged. In
another thread on this topic, I posted the following:
QUOTE
Personally, I would have no problem with a comparative religion class being taught. I think it would be a good idea for American students to know more about Islam and Buddhism and Judaism and Shinto and Hinduism - as well as Christianity, especially if free from the dogma of any particular denomination. But I think the potential danger would be in the inherent prejudice of the teachers and the possibility of various religions and sects demanding equal time with major world religions. Would most teachers not color some religions as "less serious" or even blasphemous (however unconsciously)? Would we have to include Wicca and Animism and Cargo Cults and Japanese Golf Religion? And Atheism? So, unless some system could be devised which would be both equitable, comprehensive, and totally free of bias, it should probably be avoided in the public school curriculum.
I see no problem whatsoever in studying Islam (or any other religion) at the university level, if it is in the context of the course study - in fact, I would think for many history and political science classes, it would be prerequisite. By the same token, I feel that Christianity and Judaism should also be studied - especially since
so many people in this country have such cockamamie notions about the religion they claim to practice.