QUOTE(Vampiel @ Nov 28 2004, 08:21 AM)
We have talked about the weak dollar in this thread alot but not about the trade deficit. This article does bring up some good points about the trade deficit to consider.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,139726,00.htmlI can't say I'm a big admirer of Fox News, mainly because Murdoch publishes in Britain too and intellectual rigour isn't exactly what he's famous for...try reading the Sun! (Interestingly Murdoch news in the UK is also overtly patriotic too. Rule Brittania and all that).
QUOTE
All those dollars that left the U.S. to buy foreign goods are also buying high-profit American intellectual property inside those goods. Whats more, all those dollars come back to American eventually. They are used to buy Treasury bonds or invest in the great American economic engine, chasing the growth that American companies like companies nowhere else in the world can generate
Well, firstly the whole intellectual property argument is dodgy. As the author himself says:
QUOTE
The U.S. is a huge exporter of these pieces of intellectual property, he writes, but good luck finding it in government stats its practically invisible.
Invisible huh? Thats unusual. You would have thought that if IP and design were such large segments of the US economy, then they WOULDN'T be invisible. What the author is saying is 'You can't measure it, but its there'. Sure....but supposing you can't measure it because it aint there?
QUOTE
A $300 Intel microprocessor and a $50 Microsoft operating system are exported from the U.S.; a $1000 [Toshiba laptop made in Japan] is imported, for a net trade deficit of $650. Yet on a profit basis, the U.S. clears 300 bucks, and the rest of the world maybe 50. Which economic system would you invest tin? Yeah, me too.
Ummmmmmm...no. US exports $350 and then imports something worth $1000 then the US loses $650. In the example above, the profit is $650 - going to Toshiba in Japan. Maths is maths.
QUOTE
Any apparent inequality simply leaves one country acquiring assets in the others. For example, if Americans buy automobiles from Japan, and have no other transactions with Japan, the Japanese must end up holding dollars, which they may hold in the form of bank deposits in the United States or in some other U.S. investment.
Yes, the most widely quoted argument for 'the deficit doesn't matter'. If Japan reinvested the dollars back into the US in the form of
long term investment, then the US would be the overall winner, as that Japanese investment would add to the US economy. However, this isn't happening, the money is NOT being used to generate returns from the US economy, its being used to keep the Yen, Yuan and whatever else low.