Full Version: And your father smelled of elderberries...
As per request of Jamie in another thread.
It seems on AD(America's Debate) when an individual poses a valid response to a claim made by a poster(I wont name names).
If that original poster was called on something they stated or a fact they claimed was proven incorrect or inaccurate, they tend to respond with a sarcastic post or and insult(on occasion) with no real merit what so ever.
Why not concede your error or defeat as it may be?
Sleeper
PS I have seen both sides responsible for this.
It seems on AD(America's Debate) when an individual poses a valid response to a claim made by a poster(I wont name names).
If that original poster was called on something they stated or a fact they claimed was proven incorrect or inaccurate, they tend to respond with a sarcastic post or and insult(on occasion) with no real merit what so ever.
Why not concede your error or defeat as it may be?
Sleeper
PS I have seen both sides responsible for this.
This is NOT what I meant at all....oh well.
I guess I will be starting my own thread
I guess I will be starting my own thread
Oh, shut up.
Just kidding!!!
It's not easy for many to admit they've made errors or have been proved wrong. I kinda understand people evaporating (just withdrawing from a thread without addressing challenges) more than I do people responding with abuse. If people ever spot me doing this (there's one example that I know of), please bring it to my attention!
Just kidding!!!
It's not easy for many to admit they've made errors or have been proved wrong. I kinda understand people evaporating (just withdrawing from a thread without addressing challenges) more than I do people responding with abuse. If people ever spot me doing this (there's one example that I know of), please bring it to my attention!
QUOTE(Sleeper @ Jan 23 2003, 02:27 PM)
As per request of Jamie in another thread.
It seems on AD(America's Debate) when an individual poses a valid response to a claim made by a poster(I wont name names).
If that original poster was called on something they stated or a fact they claimed was proven incorrect or inaccurate, they tend to respond with a sarcastic post or and insult(on occasion) with no real merit what so ever.
Why not concede your error or defeat as it may be?
Sleeper
PS I have seen both sides responsible for this.
It seems on AD(America's Debate) when an individual poses a valid response to a claim made by a poster(I wont name names).
If that original poster was called on something they stated or a fact they claimed was proven incorrect or inaccurate, they tend to respond with a sarcastic post or and insult(on occasion) with no real merit what so ever.
Why not concede your error or defeat as it may be?
Sleeper
PS I have seen both sides responsible for this.
Actually, Jaime's suggestion was to make a new topic regarding polls.
This line of questioning seems rather inappropriate, especially considering that you are referring to a specific poster. (I won't name names
)
QUOTE(Jaime @ Jan 23 2003, 09:39 PM)
This is NOT what I meant at all....oh well.
I guess I will be starting my own thread
I guess I will be starting my own thread
LOL you gotta give me credit for the catchy Titile
Sleeper
Since I just watched MP's Holy Grail AGAIN, last night.....I give you much credit for a catchy title......
'your mother was a hamster'
'your mother was a hamster'
This isn't about me is it? I've not kept up with all the posts.
I have a lot of misgivings about keeping this thread open. I especially don't like this "I won't name names" crap. Don't be too surprised or upset if you find this thread closed. It just has way too much potential for a flame war to start
In the meantime it couldn't hurt anyone to reread The Rules and Guidelines.
In the meantime it couldn't hurt anyone to reread The Rules and Guidelines.
This is a simplified version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.