QUOTE(ralou @ May 24 2005, 02:39 AM)
Nah, not just one. I was just warming up. As many as you like (although you and Titus are starting to scare me a little!

).
Here's another of mine:
One person, one vote. No more Electoral College. No more being disenfranchised because you live in a state that is overwhelmingly one party or the other.
OK, here are a few more of my hot buttons.
Education: We spend more per student than any other country but get mediocre results. Why? Public education is a union controlled monopoly that has no real credible competition or incentive to improve quality. The NCLB act was a good start in establishing more standards. The bar should be incrementally raised every year on both students and teachers. Also, any idea that increases competition (vouchers) is a good thing. As it stands, quality of education is not a priority. It needs to be with a carrot and stick approach.
Crime: I favor the nationwide elimination of parole for all violent criminals. If you do the crime, you do the time... all of it. There is no rational reason why the average time spent in prison for homicide should be less than 8 years. With respect to people convicted of sex crimes against children, they should be put away for life. Lock them up and throw away the key. Drugs? Well, my view is not popular but I favor increasing the penalties associated with illegal drug use. Perhaps jail time is not appropriate but large fines would certainly have an impact (I know my personal idea of caning drug users would never fly in the USA). The troika of crime/poverty/out-of-wedlock births has to be broken for our country to improve overall. We are only as strong as our weakest links. We must deal with crime in poor areas harshly otherwise we fail to create an environment where progress can occur. I also think that most "gun control" legislation targets honest citizens, not the criminals who get coddled when they are caught with illegal weapons. I favor the intent of the second amendment and right to carry laws nationwide. The right to protect one's self, family and property is inalienable in my view. Preventing people from possessing the means for that self defense is wrong.
Health care: I favor a lot more emphasis on prevention rather than just medicating our citizens to an ever increasing extent. The fact that the majority of our society is overweight and that a significant portion is "obese" is a health issue that will continue to add costs to all Americans. I also favor limiting the out-of-control malpractice suit industry which has driven costs up in every area related to health care.
Energy: The US should explore "alternative energy" as Bush is doing (fuel cells, etc.) but we should also dramatically increase our domestic oil exploration in places like ANWR and along our coastal regions. The technology of oil exploration has improved dramatically. It may be a pipe dream (no pun intended) but I see no reason why the oil industry should not be proactive and make partners out of the "environmentalists". Get them on board. Convince them that new drilling technologies are viable and get them to sign off on the technologies. Then, the fringe environmentalist crowd (who abhor capitalism anyway) will be on the fringes instead of dominating the debate through the generation of the most noise.
Environment: I'm in favor of clean air and water. But, I'm highly skeptical of PC environmental issues like "global warming" that have scant real evidence to back them up. This has become a wedge issue for no good reason. The difference between clean water standards implemented by the Bush and Clinton administrations is nearly not measurable. It's just political hot air in most cases. We need to take a rational approach and take the extremist environmentalists out of the drivers seat on these issues.
Poverty: The two drivers behind poverty in the United States are massive out-of-wedlock birth rates within specific demographics and a low emphasis placed on education within these same groups. We should realize that compassion driven programs designed to "help" have actually hurt by legitimizing illegitimate births and by minimizing the role of the father as provider. My republican friends won't appreciate one of my solutions; free contraceptives and free abortions for poor women. My liberal friends won't appreciate the fact that I would not increase welfare payments to single women who become pregnant and have more kids. With respect to welfare, I favor an approach that limits the time-frame that people can collect these payments without providing some service. Even if they can't find "a job", there are a lot of things that need to be done and ANYONE (outside of those mentally of physically handicapped) who receive taxpayer assistance should be required to provide some sort of community service. In Michigan, the city of Detroit has the largest concentration of welfare receipients in the state. Yet, the place is filthy. Garbage litters nearly every highway and street. Why don't we have an army of welfare receipients picking up the mess at a minimum? If you get a check, you get off your butt and not just sit around and watch Jerry Springer and "hang" with your friends. If nothing else, the enforcement of a work ethic would help those same people get OFF welfare and if the time-frame was limited, there would be an incentive.
Race relations: The United States should lead the world by implementing a truly "progressive" idea; the removal of the concept of "race" from consideration as an "important" descriptor of people. Moving toward a color blind society will take time, but we should start now. Those who favor self imposed segregation should realize that this is no solution; just a continuation of an age old problem. Affirmative action , in all of its forms should be eliminated. However, if discrimination based on race/sex is proven, it should be harshly punished legally (as it is now).
The Courts: I strongly favor appointing judges who vow to enforce the constitution as written and who will not legislate from the bench. I favor the IMPEACHMENT of judges who do this. The constitution ultimately puts congress in control of the judiciary and they must exercise this control. The courts are co-equal per our system yet they have taken power that is far beyond that standard.
OK, that's enough for now....