Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: An "Arab Spring"?
America's Debate > Archive > Policy Debate Archive > [A] Foreign Policy
Google
lordhelmet
I found an interesting commentary on the web this morning. The author is crediting President Bush's resolve with unleashing a "tsunami" of freedom and liberalization in one of the world's most oppressive regions.

Opinion

QUOTE
ARAB SPRING

Bush Country
The Middle East embraces democracy--and the American president.

BY FOUAD AJAMI
Sunday, May 22, 2005 12:01 a.m. EDT

"George W. Bush has unleashed a tsunami on this region," a shrewd Kuwaiti merchant who knows the way of his world said to me. The man had no patience with the standard refrain that Arab reform had to come from within, that a foreign power cannot alter the age-old ways of the Arabs. "Everything here--the borders of these states, the oil explorations that remade the life of this world, the political outcomes that favored the elites now in the saddle--came from the outside. This moment of possibility for the Arabs is no exception." A Jordanian of deep political experience at the highest reaches of Arab political life had no doubt as to why history suddenly broke in Lebanon, and could conceivably change in Syria itself before long. "The people in the streets of Beirut knew that no second Hama is possible; they knew that the rulers were under the gaze of American power, and knew that Bush would not permit a massive crackdown by the men in Damascus."

another excerpt from the same article.....
QUOTE
To venture into the Arab world, as I did recently over four weeks in Qatar, Kuwait, Jordan and Iraq, is to travel into Bush Country. I was to encounter people from practically all Arab lands, to listen in on a great debate about the possibility of freedom and liberty. I met Lebanese giddy with the Cedar Revolution that liberated their country from the Syrian prison that had seemed an unalterable curse. They were under no illusions about the change that had come their way. They knew that this new history was the gift of an American president who had put the Syrian rulers on notice. The speed with which Syria quit Lebanon was astonishing, a race to the border to forestall an American strike that the regime could not discount. I met Syrians in the know who admitted that the fear of American power, and the example of American forces flushing Saddam Hussein out of his spider hole, now drive Syrian policy. They hang on George Bush's words in Damascus, I was told: the rulers wondering if Iraq was a crystal ball in which they could glimpse their future


Questions for Debate:

1. Is this author's outlook accurate?
2. If so, why aren't US liberals, historically the supporters of pro-freedom, pro-democracy, and pro-liberalization movements, not behind our current president?
Google
hayleyanne
1. Is this author's outlook accurate?

I am sure it is. I think that the Syrian/Lebanese conduct is very telling. Although I was vehemently against the war with Iraq, I still hope that it will have this kind of effect ultimately. And when I hear reports like this, it makes me very happy.

2. If so, why aren't US liberals, historically the supporters of pro-freedom, pro-democracy, and pro-liberalization movements, not behind our current president?

The effects may wind up being positive in the middle east. But that doesn't change the fact that Bush and the neoconservatives were not honest about their motives for going over there. I think establishing "democracy" in the region was the real motive. But many americans feel betrayed by the other reasons cited that were not entirely honest. Additionally, some people believe that America looks bad in the eyes of many countries since the Iraq war-- we appear aggressive and arrogant. People don't like this. The media seems to have no interest in reporting the positives and chooses to report the negatives. Since many americans don't hear all the positives, they don't support the president.

I heard an interesting interview on Terri Gross's Fresh Air yesterday. She was interviewing a reporter who was covering the Cannes film festival. He told about how one of the films, called: Kilometre Zero, done by an Iraqui Kurd, was not received very well. In fact, the european audiences were somewhat taken aback. The film tells the story of an Iraqui Kurd who is traveling through Iraq to transport a dead relative out of the country. The message throughout the movie is clear-- the americans gave the Kurds freedom for the first time since the reign of Hussein. At the end of the film, the main character is in Paris and as the statue of Sadaam is falling, he opens up the window and yells out how he is finally free. The reporter told Gross that the audience was shocked. It all boils down to what is reported and told by the media. If we had more focus on stories like this, I am sure more people would be behind the president.
Jaime

Topic closed...


Reason: Duplicate topic.

Recommended action:
Please use the search feature to locate a similar topic. If you are unable to find a similar topic, please contact the staff member who closed the topic by clicking the PM button below this post.

Helpful links:
- Simple Search
- Advanced Search
- Starting New Topics
- Survival Guide
- The Rules
- Staff Directory

Note: This is an automated response.



We are debating this here: What if Bush is right?

Please check for existing debates before starting new ones.
Google
This is a simplified version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.